WHY I DON’T TRUST MADAME CLINTON

Elizabeth-Warren-Time

BY AINHOA ARISTIZABAL – 30 SEPT 2015

Pathetic CLINTON: Using Decades Old Pics to Make Her Seem ‘YOUNGER’
Since launching her campaign last June, Clinton has flooded the Internet and filled her TV spots with surprising, little-known images of the candidate pulled from old family photo albums, all part of a larger campaign strategy to make Clinton (67 yrs old) look younger to voters.

hillary-clinton-winking-AP-640x480

CLINTON AND THE WHITEWATER CONTROVERSY AND CRIMINAL CASES:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr960602.htm

HER LATEST BATCH OF E-MAILS:
The latest batch of Clinton’S e-mails disclosed by the State Department is perhaps the most interesting. This is not because there is a bombshell; we know she destroyed “personal” e-mails, so we are not likely to find any real nuggets in those she turned over. (In one humorous e-mail previously released, she asked whether the e-mail can be printed out “without identifiers.”) GOD PROTECT US FROM THIS AMBITIOUS WOMAN!

No, this tranche of e-mails is revealing because it shows Clinton to be lacking real authority, surrounded and protected by political hacks, filthy rich and obsessed with political power. In short, this is the real Hillary Clinton.

As secretary of State, Clinton was on the periphery, lacking much influence and devoid of creative policy-making abilities. Her e-mails reflect that. Comically, Clinton hears on the radio that there is a Cabinet meeting and e-mails to find out why she is not invited. (“I heard on the radio that there is a Cabinet mtg this am. Is there? Can I go? If not, who are we sending?”) She shows up at the White House to find another meeting canceled. She is the third wheel, the least important person in foreign policy making.

HER CRONIES AND HACKS – HER JUDGEMENT AND INSULARITY
She is, however, immersed in a web of cronies and hacks. She solicits Sid Blumenthal for advice, and not just on Libya. (“[T]he newly disclosed emails show he also acted as an intermediary with officials involved in the Northern Ireland peace process and shared advice on issues from Iran to British politics to how to blame China for the breakdown of global climate talks.”) That she should be getting advice from a political hatchet man — one whom the White House banned from the administration — tells us something about her judgment and her insularity.

Clinton’s enormous wealth and the people who helped make her wealthy make an appearance. Clinton and Huma Abedin discuss what sort of private jet she will take and her trip to the Hamptons. Just like “everyday” people! And most troubling, her e-mails are filled with discussions of corporate cronies whom she was more than willing to assist: The former secretary of state also wrote an encouraging note to Bill Owens, chairman of AEA Holdings Asia, about an effort he was pushing to open a dialogue with retired Chinese military official. short for donors? Former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell is facing jail time for much less.

And then — this is the supposedly nonpolitical secretary of state with her fixation on news reports, interest in domestic politics and outreach to labor unions. The Wall Street Journal observes: “While serving as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton was keenly attentive to domestic political issues—following the gay-rights debate, staying in touch with Democratic allies and keeping tabs on her public image—a batch of emails released by the State Department Tuesday shows. . . [She] received numerous updates from her department advisers about the changing politics of gay rights and activists’ frustration with the Obama administration. . . . The emails show Mrs. Clinton engaged with domestic political figures.” Why is this so significant?

Aside from using the taxpayers’ provided office and staff to attend to her political aspirations, it is evident that while in office Clinton was planning ahead, greasing the wheels for her campaign. That puts her receipt after leaving the State Department of outlandish speaking fees and foundation receipts in a clear light: Both she and the donors correctly figured this was cash flowing to a future presidential candidate.

And the e-mails are interesting for what they don’t include. Where is Hillary Clinton the wonk? Hillary Clinton the master of policy? Maybe there will be more of that to come. But she comes across as many critics have long surmised — vain, small-minded and, above all, politically calculating in everything she does.

One reason is that they’re usually stinking rich, even though they have to pretend not to be. Hillary Clinton’s primary interaction with lower income Americans in recent years usually involved firing them for not making her bed correctly, now she has to pretend as if she truly cares about them. It’s a tough gig.

So out come the older pictures from a happier time, before the soul-selling deal she made with her philandering husband took its toll and made her sour and imperious.Before she built up a huge bank of resentment for the American people for not giving her what she feels she’s entitled to.

Why is it that the party that portrays itself as the most caring about humans has such a difficult time making its presidential candidates seem…human? From Al Gore to John Kerry to Her Inevitable Madameship, they’re all about as personable as the stomach flu. Even Barack Obama, whose entire career is built on smirking, has been called cold and aloof by people close to him. The press calls him “professorial”, a code word for “cold and aloof”.

DONATIONS TO CLINTON’S FOUNDATION BY BIG CORPORATIONS
Unless Hillary Clinton immediately reinstates the ban on foreign countries giving to her foundation and returns the millions of dollars these governments have already donated, she’s setting an incredibly dangerous precedent,” said the chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus. “The American people are not about to elect a president in Hillary Clinton who could expose them to the demands of foreign governments because they dumped massive sums of cash into her foundation.”

i DON’T TRUST MADAME CLINTON WITH ALL HER MONEY. BUT I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED THAT SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN HAD DECIDED TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY. SHE IS YOUNGER, SMARTER, AND TOTALLY DEDICATED TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THE POOR AND NEEDY.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s